This isn't just idle curiosity on my
part--it turns out that your surgeon's real-life experience and expertise can
actually be a life-and-death matter.
In other words, your choice of a breast
surgeon can't be based on some TV commercial starring a "kind
looking" physician, or on a neighbor's semi-enthusiastic recommendation
that they "liked" Dr. So-and-So.
No, in order to find a breast surgeon
who is a skilled lifesaver, you're going to have to seek out and evaluate the
information that's available about his or her medical expertise. Here's why.
Recurrence rates of breast cancer vary
widely
It turns out that the chances that a
surgeon's patients will experience a recurrence of cancer in the same breast (a
"local recurrence") vary shockingly. Some surgeons see recurrence in
only 15 percent of their patients, while others have recurrence rates as high
as 35 percent. Ladies, 15 percent to 35 percent is an awfully big point spread
when making decisions about who will help ensure you become cancer free and
stay cancer free.
This means that a woman's risk for
local recurrence depends in part on which surgeon she chooses. Take ductal
carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as an example. This type of cancer, also known as noninvasive
breast cancer, is typically treated with either
- ·
lumpectomy (also known as breast-conserving surgery) or
- ·
mastectomy
Which surgeons are best at avoiding
recurrences?
And whether or not a woman remains
cancer free also depends in part on which of these treatments her surgeon
decides to perform.
All of which leads one to hope that the
surgeon bases this decision on a great deal of hands-on experience and a solid
theoretical knowledge of when each of these 2 procedures will bring about
optimal results, right? Well, I hate to say it, but many times this hope is not
borne out by the facts.
Here's why I say this: The January 3,
2011, issue of The Journal of the National Cancer Institute
contains a study by the RAND corporation that compared the effectiveness of
various strategies used between 1983 and 2000 to treat DCIS. Based on
this research, the 2 factors that best predicted that a breast cancer would not
recur were:
- if, under the microscope, all 6 margins of the surgical
specimen (from either a lumpectomy or mastectomy) are determined to have
no cancer cells or abnormal cells at the edges--a condition referred to as
"clear margins."
- if the woman received radiation therapy following
lumpectomy (breast-conserving) surgery
Many surgeons come up short
Sad to say, the researchers found
that many of the surgeons in the study did not know that these 2 factors were
lifesavers. Some of the surgeons did not even know when a lumpectomy could be
safely carried out while still providing the patient with the same
survival rate as a mastectomy, versus when the more radical mastectomy
absolutely had to be done.
Remember up above, when I said that
breast-cancer surgeons differed widely as to how many of their patients had
local recurrences--from 15 percent to 35 percent? Well, the Rand study
found that most of the surgeons with the highest recurrence rates (up to 35
percent) either didn't pay attention to the microscopic margins of the tumors
they removed, or didn't know that giving radiation after lumpectomy was
absolutely essential, or both.
The bottom line
This report from the Rand Corporation
supports previous studies that emphasize, when one is facing breast cancer
surgery, the importance of
- choosing someone who is a breast surgical
oncologist. Please repeat after me: a breast surgical oncologist
- not choosing a general surgeon who ordinarily spends
the day taking out gallbladders or doing hernia repairs
In making this last point, I in no way
mean to belittle general surgeons, who perform vital, lifesaving operations
daily. I am just emphasizing that when you need your hernia repaired, go to a
general surgeon whose expertise is hernia repairs. But when you have breast
cancer, seek out a surgeon who has completed a fellowship in breast surgical
oncology and now specializes in this disease.